However, "Serb World" proposed by Serbian leaders is not even a cultural or humanitarian concept. How this theory can be implemented given the fact that there are shifts in geopolitics, is a different question. Under Russian and Chinese influence, Serbia should become a force that will dominate Southeast Europe and secure economic corridors to Germany. According to him, the key country for ensuring Russian influence in the Balkans is Serbia. Alexander Dugin, a Russian theorist of Eurasian rise and supremacy, believes that the new axis should be based on the tripartite configuration Berlin-Moscow-Beijing as the bearers of the construction of the future “Eurasian Empire”. Interestingly, Moscow is advocating for a "Serb World" as a humanitarian concept "which is justified and in accordance with international law." By looking at the geopolitical level, we can understand Russia’s position.
Rs turmoil full#
The resumption of full control of Montenegro, the dismemberment of Kosovo, and destabilization until the partition of Bosnia and Herzegovina are the main goals that are being implemented daily. The narrative of the "Serb World" is beginning to come to life synchronously, so without a doubt, that openness primarily serves as the integration of Serbs in the region. Precisely based on Memorandum 2, which defines the rise and position of the hegemon in the Balkans, it is possible to detect what this "openness" is for. In this context, one can observe the initiatives that come from Vucic, above all the Open Balkans. "Serbian pretensions in the region are growing, Serbia feels as if it has won the elections in Montenegro and that cannot pass without consequences for the region, and Vucic's dream of being a Serbian regional leader is fuller," Zarko Korac told the Istinomer portal revealed what everyone is aware of but for some reason, they were not willing to say openly. A report by the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) provides valuable insight into malignant interference under the auspices of the protection of the Slavic Brethren, leading to historical reminiscences and the identification of today's Russia with the Russian Empire and anti-Ottoman alliances two centuries ago. The two consecutive elections in Montenegro (20) showed even more drastically how strong the connection between Belgrade and Moscow is and the extent to which actions in the WB are being synchronized.
Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic also strengthened his vastness and settled accounts with the opposition at home by lamenting about it. It actually sheds light on everything happening in Bosnia and Herzegovina, but also in the Western Balkan (WB) countries during the last decade.īy interfering - with the support of Russia - in the elections in (Northern) Macedonia (2017), constantly dramatizing the situation as the “Macedonian scenario”,Belgrade is already quietly destabilizing its southern neighbor. It takes several years, at most decades, to realize these goals.” This quote is stated at the very beginning of the document as the leitmotif. The fact that certain parts of the international community would have nothing against the division of B&H is an extremely important weapon that must be used to the maximum in the realization of the set goals. "Bosnia and Herzegovina is more important, but also much easier case than Croatia and Montenegro, thanks to the Dayton Agreement and the fact that behind the so-called united B&H only Muslims and parts of the fragmented, confused and idealess international community stand united. By doing that, they aim not to confront the past but blame the others. The goal is to reduce Serbia's damage from war defeats, its guilt, and responsibility, work to equalize aggressors and victims, etc. Thus, undermining the situation in neighboring countries. Very much like the Memorandum from 1986, this document was based on the Greater Serbia policy of "blood and soil", according to which Serbia is where Serbs live. The document Strategy for Preservation and Strengthening of Relations between the Homeland and the Diaspora and the Homeland and Serbs in the Region (Memorandum 2) from 2011, presented to the Bosnian public by the magazine Slobodna Bosna (March 2013) created a necessary caution in the region.
The intensification of deepening Serbia’s special ties with one of the two entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Republika Srpska, coincided with the political processes in the Western Balkans during the second decade of the 21st century and the establishment of the Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) dominated government. Political crisis in Bosnia and Herzegovina is reaching a dangerous point with possible regional impacts. The writer is an expert in contemporary world history, teaching at the International University of Sarajevo (IUS) and Department of International Relations and Diplomacy at the Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Sarajevo.